Earlier this week was the hearing for the preliminary injunction that Epic filed asking the court to prevent Apple from removing Fortnite from the store and revoking Epic’s App Store developer licenses. (Unreal Engine was spared but Fortnite remains gone). During that hearing, as reported by Cnet, California Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers maintained her initial decision to uphold Apple removing Fortnite from the App Store. She criticized Epic’s decision to covertly bypass Apple’s cut of V-Bucks sales, the event that initially led Apple to kick Fortnite off the App Store. “You were not forthright,” she said. “You were told you couldn’t do it, and you did. There’s an old saying, a rose by any other name is still a rose […] There are plenty of people in the public could consider you guys heroes for what you did, but it’s still not honest.” She also challenged Epic’s claims of irreparable harm from their the preliminary injunction filing. “There’s no case law that says that my billion-dollar company is losing some millions and so therefore that’s irreparable harm,” she said. On Monday, Rogers recommended that the lawsuit go to a trial by jury, saying “I think it is important enough to understand what real people think. Do these security issues concern people or not?” Well, that recommendation revealed one thing that Apple and Epic do actually agree on. They both say thanks but no thanks to a trial by jury. Gamesindustry.biz report that the companies have filed a joint statement on the matter. Rogers expects the case to be heard in July 2021. “Therefore, with Epic’s consent, Apple hereby withdraws its demand for a jury trial…The parties respectfully request that the case—including any claims and counterclaims—proceed to a bench trial on a schedule determined by the court.”
